Difference between revisions of "Ates EEG study metadata and is described beneath. Initial versions of"

From Mu Origin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Ates EEG study metadata and is described beneath. Initial versions of)
m (Ates EEG study metadata and is described beneath. Initial versions of)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Containers are standalone entities that include things like all of the information and facts required for a researcher to know and course of action the data. A essential result is the fact that researchers can then create completely documented, automated processing procedures applying standardized container interfaces. This standardization means that code for processing HED/ESS information, when written, may be applied to any ESS-containerized study. ESS defines containers for data at unique typical levels of processing. Figure 1 shows these stages of data processing and tools employed to transform data to ESS requirements. EEG evaluation relies on identifying events and accurately marking their instances of occurrence with respect for the EEG information. Researchers need to derive experimentally relevant events from experiment manage system logs and/or from the data10bigeeg.orgheadit.org www.eegstudy.orgTABLE 1 | Overview of EEG information technologies. Work BigEEG (ESS  HED) G-NODE PhysioNet EEG/ERP portal NEMO INCF Dataspace NITRC CARMEN BIDS XNAT COINS SeedMe FigShare Dryad Concentrate EEG EEG Cellular and systems neurophysiology ECG Raw EEG, ERP Raw EEG, ERP Basic GeneralNeuroscience Electrophysiology (cells) fMRI fMRI, MRI fMRI, MRI Basic Common General A/O Yes No odML No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Mul Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YES YES Meta ESS odML OWL, RDF odML No odML No No No MINI NIDM-Experiment Yes COINS DB No No No Occasion HED No No No No NEMO No No No No No No No No NoIn the column titles: A/O, accessible offline (file system representation); Mul, multimodal information assistance (e.g., eye tracking, motion capture); Meta, study metadata ontology; Event, occasion description ontology utilised (No, none).Frontiers in Neuroinformatics | www.frontiersin.orgMarch 2016 | Volume ten | ArticleBigdely-Shamlo et al.Containerizing EEG for Large-Scale AnalysisFIGURE 1 | EEG Study Schema (ESS) processing stages and tools used to transform information into successive containerized ESS common level formats (Delorme and Makeig, 2004; Kothe and Makeig, 2013).themselves (e.g., occurrences of eye blinks, saccades, physique movements, EEG sleep spindles, and so on.). A key step for data preservation and sharing is always to annotate these experimental events using a standardized vocabulary instead of laboratory-specific or project-specific codes. In ESS, that is achieved by utilizing new version 2.0 with the Hierarchical Occasion Descriptor (HED) tagging program we've got created (Bigdely-Shamlo et al., 2013b) to describe complex real-world events.Ates EEG study metadata and is described beneath. Initial versions of those technologies have been created below the HeadIT project (Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, UCSD), which also hosts an internet file-sharing resource10 . Table 1 compares BigEEG with all the other technologies reviewed in this section with regards to specified requirements.Containerization for Large-Scale AnalysisThe BigEEG work is organized around the idea of an EEG study, defined as a self-contained group of (possibly multimodal) EEG information sets recorded working with a single or much more experiment paradigms. The EEG Study Schema (ESS) version 2.011 specifies several levels of standardization and supporting infrastructure designed to make the information transportable, searchable, and extractable. EEG Study Schema is constructed on the concept of information containers. Each container is a folder with a particular arrangement of files as well as a standardized XML descriptor file specifying studylevel metadata.
+
Table 1 compares BigEEG with all the other technologies reviewed in this section when it comes to specified specifications.Containerization for Large-Scale AnalysisThe BigEEG effort is organized about the [https://www.medchemexpress.com/IMD-0354.html IKK2 Inhibitor V Epigenetic Reader Domain] concept of an EEG study, [https://www.medchemexpress.com/AAI101.html AAI101 manufacturer] defined as a self-contained group of (possibly multimodal) EEG data sets recorded employing 1 or far more experiment paradigms. ESS defines containers for information at distinct [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Rapamycin.html Rapamycin supplier] standard levels of processing. Figure 1 shows these stages of data processing and tools made use of to transform information to ESS standards. EEG evaluation relies on identifying events and accurately marking their instances of occurrence with respect towards the EEG information. Researchers must derive experimentally relevant events from experiment handle program logs and/or in the data10bigeeg.orgheadit.org www.eegstudy.orgTABLE 1 | Overview of EEG data technologies. Effort BigEEG (ESS  HED) G-NODE PhysioNet EEG/ERP portal NEMO INCF Dataspace NITRC CARMEN BIDS XNAT COINS SeedMe FigShare Dryad Focus EEG EEG Cellular and systems neurophysiology ECG Raw EEG, ERP Raw EEG, ERP Common GeneralNeuroscience Electrophysiology (cells) fMRI fMRI, MRI fMRI, MRI General Basic Common A/O Yes No odML No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Mul Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YES YES Meta ESS odML OWL, RDF odML No odML No No No MINI NIDM-Experiment Yes COINS DB No No No Occasion HED No No No No NEMO No No No No No No No No NoIn the column titles: A/O, readily available offline (file program representation); Mul, multimodal information support (e.g., eye tracking, motion capture); Meta, study metadata ontology; Event, occasion description ontology utilised (No, none).Frontiers in Neuroinformatics | www.frontiersin.orgMarch 2016 | [https://www.medchemexpress.com/AZD4547.html AZD4547 MedChemExpress| Biological Activity| Purity| custom synthesis| Autophagy| MSDS] Volume ten | ArticleBigdely-Shamlo et al.Containerizing EEG for Large-Scale AnalysisFIGURE 1 | EEG Study Schema (ESS) processing stages and tools utilized to transform data into successive containerized ESS common level formats (Delorme and Makeig, 2004; Kothe and Makeig, 2013).themselves (e.g., occurrences of eye blinks, saccades, physique movements, EEG sleep spindles, and so on.). A crucial step for information preservation and sharing is to annotate these experimental events applying a standardized vocabulary as opposed to laboratory-specific or project-specific codes. In ESS, this really is achieved by using new version 2.0 from the Hierarchical Event Descriptor (HED) tagging method we've got developed (Bigdely-Shamlo et al., 2013b) to describe complex real-world events.Ates EEG study metadata and is described below. Initial versions of those technologies had been developed under the HeadIT project (Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, UCSD), which also hosts a web based file-sharing resource10 . Table 1 compares BigEEG using the other technologies reviewed in this section with regards to specified requirements.Containerization for Large-Scale AnalysisThe BigEEG effort is organized around the idea of an EEG study, defined as a self-contained group of (possibly multimodal) EEG information sets recorded employing one or a lot more experiment paradigms. The EEG Study Schema (ESS) version two.011 specifies quite a few levels of standardization and supporting infrastructure created to produce the information transportable, searchable, and extractable. EEG Study Schema is built on the notion of information containers.

Latest revision as of 23:37, 29 May 2020

Table 1 compares BigEEG with all the other technologies reviewed in this section when it comes to specified specifications.Containerization for Large-Scale AnalysisThe BigEEG effort is organized about the IKK2 Inhibitor V Epigenetic Reader Domain concept of an EEG study, AAI101 manufacturer defined as a self-contained group of (possibly multimodal) EEG data sets recorded employing 1 or far more experiment paradigms. ESS defines containers for information at distinct Rapamycin supplier standard levels of processing. Figure 1 shows these stages of data processing and tools made use of to transform information to ESS standards. EEG evaluation relies on identifying events and accurately marking their instances of occurrence with respect towards the EEG information. Researchers must derive experimentally relevant events from experiment handle program logs and/or in the data10bigeeg.orgheadit.org www.eegstudy.orgTABLE 1 | Overview of EEG data technologies. Effort BigEEG (ESS HED) G-NODE PhysioNet EEG/ERP portal NEMO INCF Dataspace NITRC CARMEN BIDS XNAT COINS SeedMe FigShare Dryad Focus EEG EEG Cellular and systems neurophysiology ECG Raw EEG, ERP Raw EEG, ERP Common GeneralNeuroscience Electrophysiology (cells) fMRI fMRI, MRI fMRI, MRI General Basic Common A/O Yes No odML No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Mul Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YES YES Meta ESS odML OWL, RDF odML No odML No No No MINI NIDM-Experiment Yes COINS DB No No No Occasion HED No No No No NEMO No No No No No No No No NoIn the column titles: A/O, readily available offline (file program representation); Mul, multimodal information support (e.g., eye tracking, motion capture); Meta, study metadata ontology; Event, occasion description ontology utilised (No, none).Frontiers in Neuroinformatics | www.frontiersin.orgMarch 2016 | AZD4547 MedChemExpress| Biological Activity| Purity| custom synthesis| Autophagy| MSDS Volume ten | ArticleBigdely-Shamlo et al.Containerizing EEG for Large-Scale AnalysisFIGURE 1 | EEG Study Schema (ESS) processing stages and tools utilized to transform data into successive containerized ESS common level formats (Delorme and Makeig, 2004; Kothe and Makeig, 2013).themselves (e.g., occurrences of eye blinks, saccades, physique movements, EEG sleep spindles, and so on.). A crucial step for information preservation and sharing is to annotate these experimental events applying a standardized vocabulary as opposed to laboratory-specific or project-specific codes. In ESS, this really is achieved by using new version 2.0 from the Hierarchical Event Descriptor (HED) tagging method we've got developed (Bigdely-Shamlo et al., 2013b) to describe complex real-world events.Ates EEG study metadata and is described below. Initial versions of those technologies had been developed under the HeadIT project (Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, UCSD), which also hosts a web based file-sharing resource10 . Table 1 compares BigEEG using the other technologies reviewed in this section with regards to specified requirements.Containerization for Large-Scale AnalysisThe BigEEG effort is organized around the idea of an EEG study, defined as a self-contained group of (possibly multimodal) EEG information sets recorded employing one or a lot more experiment paradigms. The EEG Study Schema (ESS) version two.011 specifies quite a few levels of standardization and supporting infrastructure created to produce the information transportable, searchable, and extractable. EEG Study Schema is built on the notion of information containers.